SCHEDULE OF FEES (Effective from 1 January 2022)
SERVICE
|
AMOUNT
|
REFERENCE |
APPOINTMENT SERVICE FEE
|
SGD 1,500
|
Paid to SCMA under Rule 8.6 and 9.3 for every
arbitrator appointed SCMA Chairperson
|
CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATOR
|
SGD 4,000
|
Paid to SCMA under Rule 13.1 for Chairperson to determine challenge an arbitrator's appointment |
EXPEDITED PROCEDURE (ARBITRATOR FEE CAP)
|
The arbitrator fee cap ranges from USD 10,000 to USD15,000
Aggregate claims and counterclaims up to or equal to USD 200,000: Fee cap of USD 10,000
Aggregate claims and counterclaims up to or equal to USD 300,000: Fee cap of USD 10,000 plus 5% of the amount by which the claim exceeds USD 200,000 (Maximum USD 15,000)
|
These amounts are fee caps and arbitrators may charge a lower rate. They should be paid directly to the arbitrator under Rule 44.12
|
EXPEDITED PROCEDURE (LEGAL COSTS CAP)
|
The legal costs cap ranges from USD 15,000 to USD 20,000
Aggregate claims and counterclaims are up to or equal to USD 200,000: USD 15,000
Where Aggregate claims and counterclaims are up to or equal to USD 300,000: USD 15,000 plus 5% of the amount by which the claims exceeds USD 200,000 (Maximum USD 20,000)
|
These amounts are fee caps for recoverable legal fees. The arbitrator should take note of these caps when determining the costs of arbitration under Rule 44.13
|
AUTHENTICATION OF ORIGINAL AWARD
|
SGD 150 per award
|
Paid to SCMA
|
CERTIFICATION OF COPY OF
AUTHENTICATED AWARD
|
SGD 150 per award
|
Paid to SCMA
|
CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINAL ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
|
SGD 150 per agreement |
Paid to SCMA |
CERTIFICATION OF EXISTENCE AND STATUS OF ARBITRATION |
SGD 150 per certification |
Paid to SCMA |
FUND HOLDING
|
SGD 1,200 per annum
|
Paid to SCMA under Rule 42 and/or Fund Holding Agreement
|
VIRTUAL HEARINGS
SPECIMEN DIRECTIONS FOR VIRTUAL HEARINGS
EXPLANATORY NOTES TO VIRTUAL HEARINGS
ARTICLES BY MEMBERSWe are pleased to introduce this page to our website to promote better interaction between ourselves. Members who have articles of potential interest should feel free to contribute to this page.
ARTICLE 175
Singapore High Court Reiterates The High Threshold For Setting Aside Arbitral Awards
Prakaash Silvam, Tan Yu Hang, Vedanta Vishwakarma
ARTICLE 174
Strategic Considerations in Ship Sale & Purchase Transactions and the Crucial Role of the Escrow Agent
Oon Thian Seng, Angeline Woo (Oon & Bazul LLP)
ARTICLE 173
Hyphen Trading Ltd v BLPL Singapore Pte Ltd and others [2023] SGHC 302
Leanne Cheng, Senior Associate, Helmsman LLC
ARTICLE 172
Interpreting the Date of Default under the Default Clause of GAFTA contracts
Ng Guang Yi, Prakaash Silvam, Vedanta Vishwakarma (Oon & Bazul LLP)
ARTICLE 171
Ship Arrest in Singapore: Singapore High Court decides that a “floating fish farm” amounts to a ship for the purposes of invoking the Court’s Admiralty Jurisdiction
Prakaash Silvam, Ng Guang Yi, Vedanta Vishwakarma (Oon & Bazul LLP)
ARTICLE 170
Early Dismissal of Claims and Defences under Rule 29 of the SIAC Rules
Prakaash Silvam, Christian Teo, Vedanta Vishwakarma (Oon & Bazul LLP)
ARTICLE 169
Case Notes: The "Jeil Crystal" - Switching Bills of Lading
Daniel Liang, Partner, Allen & Gledhill LLP
ARTICLE 168
Joint Media Release on Singapore International Commercial Court Jurisdiction Model Clause
SCMASICC
ARTICLE 167
Singapore reinforces its position as a friendly jurisdiction for mortgagee arrest by becoming a signatory to the Beijing Convention on the Judicial Sale of Ships
Prakaash Silvam, Ng Guang Yi, Vedanta Vishwakarma (Oon & Bazul LLP)
ARTICLE 166
SCMA arbitration and mediation in the changing landscape of dispute resolution.
Bazul Ashhab, Oon & Bazul
ARTICLE 165
Does an all risks marine cargo policy cover fraudulent documents for a non-existent cargo?
Prakaash Silvam, Oon & BazulNg Guang Yi, Oon & Bazul
ARTICLE 164
Singapore Court decides that interim awards made by an emergency arbitrator in a foreign seated arbitration can be enforced in Singapore.
Prakash Silvam, Onn & BazulTan Yu Hang, Onn & Bazul
ARTICLE 163
What is the Applicable Law to Determine Whether a Dispute is Arbitrable at the Pre-Award Stage?
Adrian Wong, R&TAng Leong Hao, R&T
ARTICLE 162
Shedding Light on Shades Of Grey: Time Bar Applies to Misdelivery Claims
Mike Phillips, Partner, WFWArchit Dhir, Senior Associate, WFW
ARTICLE 161
Insurance Claims for Marine Collision
Jainil Bhandari, Partner, R&TAleksandar Georgiev, Partner, R&T
ARTICLE 160
LNG bunkering: long-term contracts for a transitional fuel
Elinor Dautlich, Partner, HFWWilliam Gidman, Partner, HFW
ARTICLE 159
Welcome relief for carriers facing misdelivery claims
David RichardsDirector (Claims), North of England P&I
ARTICLE 158
Bills of Lading – Title to Sue
Muthu JagannathDirector, Nau Pte. Ltd.
ARTICLE 157
The Shipping Law Review (Chamberlain, Calaço & Neylon) (Law Business Research Ltd, 9th Ed, 2022)
Andrew Chamberlain, Holly Colaço, Richard Neylon John Martin
ARTICLE 156
Reasonably Secure or Allowed to Arrest?
David Handley & Hsu Mei O’NeillWatson Farley & Williams (London)
ARTICLE 155
The Singapore Maritime Cluster: Arbitrate, Mediate, or Settle? (The Marine Insurer)
John MartinGard Singapore
ARTICLE 154
The Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration Responds to Industry Shifts in the 4th Edition of the SCMA Arbitration Rules (Jus Mundi)
Oon & Bazul LLP
ARTICLE 153
SCMA 2021 Maritime Enforcement Series (Compilation of 15 Jurisdictions)
SCMA
ARTICLE 152
Recoverability of Wage Payments Made to Seafarers by a P&I Club as Sheriff's Expenses – A Landmark Decision in India
Rajah & Tann Asia
ARTICLE 151
How Digitalisation And Decarbonisation May Lead To Disputes
SMW 2022 Dailies Issue 4(published by The Nutgraf)
ARTICLE 150
Payment of Kidnap & Ransom Insurance Premium by Charterer and Relief for Cargo of General Average Contribution Liability: The Polar
Dr. Arun Kasi
ARTICLE 149
Speed-Consumption Claims: A Guidebook
Dr. Arun Kasi
ARTICLE 148
Indian Finance Bill 2022 proposes tax incentives to India Shipping Industry
Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe
ARTICLE 147
SEADOCC – The Right Forum For Low Quantum Collision Claims?
Gho Sze Kee, Danielle PereiraThe Shipowners' Club
ARTICLE 146
General Average: A Handbook (Cases Summary: 2012 - 2021 included)
Dr. Arun Kasi, Karthika Arunachalam
ARTICLE 145
What’s in it for me?
SCMA 4th Edition Rules from a practical user’s viewpoint
Punit OzaSCMA
ARTICLE 144
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: Malaysian Arbitration & Maritime Law
Jainil Bhandari, Sivaram Prasad, Derrick LeongChristopher & Lee Ong
ARTICLE 143
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: A Guide to New Zealand Arbitration
Simon Cartwright, Richard Belcher, Lydia SharpeHesketh Henry
ARTICLE 142
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: Enforceability of SCMA Awards in Hong Kong
Damien Laracy, Felix Chung Hill Dickinson Hong Kong
ARTICLE 141
Ship Arrest and the Malaysian Admiralty Court
Philip Teoh
ARTICLE 140
Maritime Disputes Post 2020 and Lessons from Malaysian Courts
Philip Teoh
ARTICLE 139
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: Overview of Bangladeshi Arbitration and Maritime Law
Mohammed Forrukh Rahman, Tanzina Sharmee, Khandaker Mashfique Ahmed Rahman’s Chambers
ARTICLE 138
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series – Enforceability of an SCMA Award: A View from Vietnam
Dang Vu Minh Ha, Tran Trung Hieu Dzungsrt & Associates LLC
ARTICLE 137
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: Arbitration of Maritime Disputes – a Myanmar Perspective
Minn Naing Oo, Kang Yanyi, Nang San Aung Allen & Gledhill (Myanmar)
ARTICLE 136
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Maritime Law – A Sri Lankan Perspective
Savantha De Saram,Jivan Goonetilleke,Gayani RambukwellaD. L. & F. De Saram
ARTICLE 135
Autonomous vessels as ships – the definition conundrum
This paper was refereed and presented at The 3rd International Conference on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (ICMASS 2020).
Mayank SuriCentre for Maritime Law, NUS
ARTICLE 134
Speed and Consumption Claims
A practical perspective and statistics
Prokopios Krikris
ARTICLE 133
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series – Maritime Arbitration: Thai Laws and Foreign Awards
Peter Shelford, Yodwarat Tedkham, Karn Sittikriengkrai DLA Piper (Thailand) Limited
ARTICLE 132
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series – At Long Last, Justice Through Cost Recovery: Maritime Arbitration in the Philippines
Valeriano del Rosario, Maria Theresa GonzalesVera Law
ARTICLE 131
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: Arbitration and Maritime Law in Korea – A Comprehensive Overview
Byung-Suk Chung, Daehee Lee Kim & Chang
ARTICLE 130
Dichotomy Between Admiralty Proceedings and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC)- Raj Shipping Agencies
Aarna Law LLP & Simha Law
ARTICLE 129
SCMA Arb-Med-Arb Protocol
SCMA
ARTICLE 128
Why Choose SCMA?
SCMA
ARTICLE 127
Why Choose SCMA? (In Mandarin)
SCMA
ARTICLE 126
Why Choose SCMA? (In Bahasa Indonesia)
SCMA
ARTICLE 125
SCMA Small Claims Procedure
SCMA
ARTICLE 124
‘WOG’ Danger in Speed-Consumption Warranties
DR. ARUN KASIARUN KASI & CO
ARTICLE 123
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: An Insight into Japanese Maritime and Arbitration Law
Yamaguchi ShujiOkabe & Yamaguchi
ARTICLE 122
Your Dispute Resolution toolbox: making mediation a default option (First published by Seatrade Maritime News)
John Sze (Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP)Punit Oza (SCMA)
ARTICLE 121
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series: Indian Perspectives on Arbitration & Maritime Law
Ashwin Shanker, Balaji Harish Iyer, Rishi Murarka, Ram Jay NarayanThe Chambers of George Rebello
ARTICLE 120
Speed and Consumption Claims: A practical perspective
Prokopios Krikris
ARTICLE 119
A Snapshot Guide to Laytime & Demurrage: 40 years published London Maritime Arbitration Awards (1980-2020)
Prokopios Krikris
ARTICLE 118
2021 Maritime
Arbitration
Enforcement Series: Arbitration and Maritime Law in Australia
Danella Wilmshurst, Janine Liang, Olga Kubyk Norton White
ARTICLE 117
A Revisit to The Ocean Virgo
Dr. Arun Kasi Arun Kasi & Co
ARTICLE 116
Bottom Fouling: Whose head it falls on?
Dr. Arun Kasi Arun Kasi & Co
ARTICLE 115
Frasers Vietnam Arbitration Guide 2021
Earl Rivera-DoleraFrasers Law Company
ARTICLE 114
The ‘About’ Margin in Speed-Consumption Warranty
Dr. Arun Kasi Arun Kasi & Co
ARTICLE 113
2021 Maritime Arbitration Enforcement Series – Maritime Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Enforcement: An Indonesian Law Perspective
Soemadipradja & Taher Advocates in association with Allen & Gledhill
ARTICLE 112
Staying Relevant in Changing Times
First published in Issue 48 of Singapore Nautilus, a corporate magazine produced by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (https://www.mpa.gov.sg/)
Singapore NautilusIssue 48
ARTICLE 111
Closer Collaboration Between SCMA & Baltic Exchange
First published in Issue 48 of Singapore Nautilus, a corporate magazine produced by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (https://www.mpa.gov.sg/)
Singapore NautilusIssue 48
ARTICLE 110
Hire Deductions and Reductions: Implications of Resorting to the Self-Help Remedy?
Dr. Arun Kasi Arun Kasi & Co
ARTICLE 109
Time Charter: Speed Claim or Off-Hire Claim?
Dr. Arun Kasi Arun Kasi & Co
ARTICLE 108
Performance Claims - NYPE 1946/1993: Establishing and Extrapolating
Dr. Arun Kasi Arun Kasi & Co
ARTICLE 107
2021 Maritime
Arbitration
Enforcement Series: Enforcement of SCMA Awards in Mainland China
Chong Ik Wei, Flora Tang, Jiang Si CongClyde & Co
ARTICLE 106
Choosing an arbitration model – why flexibility is key
An extract from GAR’s The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review 2022, first published in June 2021. The whole publication is available at https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-asia-pacific-arbitration-review/2022
Damien YeoLegal Manager, SCMA
ARTICLE 105
Digitization of Bills of Lading - A Step in the Right Direction
Shardul ThackerMulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe
ARTICLE 104
The Risk of Cargo Liquefaction
Philip TeohAZMI & ASSOCIATES MALAYSIA
ARTICLE 103
The New Electronic Transactions Law in Singapore: Paving the Way for Electronic Bills of Lading?
Patrick Dahm, FCIArbdahm adr
ARTICLE 102
Indian parties can choose a foreign seat of arbitration but can they also choose foreign law to govern their contract?: The end of a saga or the beginning of a new one!!
Amitava Majumdar (Raja) & Pabitra DuttaBose & Mitra & Co.
ARTICLE 101
Covid-19 crew-change crisis poses ongoing challenge
First published by Maritime Risk International (April 2021 issue) and reproduced with permission of the Author
Will PyleCampbell Johnston Clark
ARTICLE 100
Sugar cargoes, not as sweet as they seem?
Pieter Bruins & Michel Vonk MS Amlin
ARTICLE 99
Arbitration in an age of digitalisation and the new normal
First published in Singapore Maritime Week 2021 Dailies Issue 4, published by The Nutgraf
Derek Wong The Nutgraf
ARTICLE 98
Electronic Bills of Lading: A (forgotten) way forward?
Additional commentary from Jim Leighton, Consultant (FD&D) at North P&I Club;
First published in the Views from the Bridge at 36 Stone (sixth edition)
Prof Charles Debattista & Andrew Ng 36 Stone
ARTICLE 97
"Splitting the Steel" in Shipping Joint Venture Agreements
Daniel Saunders & Damian AdamsWatson Farley & Williams
ARTICLE 96
Legal and commercial consequences from the Indian perspective arising out of the MV Ever Given grounding in the Suez Canal
Aditya KrishnamurthyBose & Mitra & Co.
ARTICLE 95
The Contractual Consequences of the Suez Canal Blockage on Charterers and Shipowners
Prakaash Silvam & Juegan SundaralingamOon & Bazul
ARTICLE 94
“EVER GIVEN”/closure of Suez Canal
Briefing Note
Andrew Rourke & Chong Ik Wei Clyde & Co
ARTICLE 93
Ever Given – Insurance and Legal Implications
Philip TeohAzmi & Associates Malaysia
ARTICLE 92
Guidance From the Singapore High Court on the Interaction Between Insolvency and Admiralty Law and Resolution of Tensions Between the Two
Kelly YapOon & Bazul
ARTICLE 91
Law Bites – November 2020
Thong Ying Xuan Joseph Tan Jude Benny
ARTICLE 90
Singapore Court of Appeal Sheds Light on When Commercial Negotiations Can Give Rise to a Concluded Contract
Prakaash Silvam & Joshua TanOon & Bazul
ARTICLE 89
Maritime Singapore Ecosystem: What Next?
(First published in Horizon, MPA Academy e-newsletter (Nov 2020, Issue 8))
Punit OzaED, SCMA & MPAA Senior Adjunct Fellow
ARTICLE 88
Maritime Arbitration: A Brief Overview
(First published by the Singapore Maritime Foundation as part of their thought leadership series, ‘Voices of Maritime’)
Singapore Maritime Foundation
ARTICLE 87
Resolving Maritime Disputes Smartly & Effectively
(First published by the Singapore Maritime Foundation as part of their thought leadership series, ‘Voices of Maritime’)
Punit OzaExecutive Director, SCMA
ARTICLE 86
Ship Recycling in India and the recent enactment
of the Recycling of Ships Act, 2019
Amitava Majumdar, Rahul Miranda, Tripti SharmaBose & Mitra & Co.
ARTICLE 85
Impact of COVID-19 on Maritime Education and Way
Forward
Md Ikramul Hossain, Undergraduate,Bangladesh Marine Academy
ARTICLE 84
Force Majeure events during COVID-19
(This article is reproduced with permission from Sarah McCann at North P&I Club. It was originally published in their Signals 120 publication and online at: https://www.nepia.com/articles/force-majeure-events-during-covid-19/)
Sarah McCann North P&I Club
ARTICLE 83
Case Note on The Eternal Bliss Judgement
Gavin VallelyHFW Australia
ARTICLE 82
Major Relief for Steamer Agents: The Supreme Court Clarifies
The Position On Ground Rent Charges For Uncleared Cargo
Amitava Majumdar, Damayanti Sen, Tripti SharmaBose & Mitra & Co.
ARTICLE 81
Sevilleja v Marex: New Hope for Creditors of Impecunious Counterparties?
STEFFEN PEDERSEN & WILLIAM WILSONPENNINGTONS MANCHES COOPER
ARTICLE 80
Reducing Costs in your Maritime Arbitration at the SCMA
STEFFEN PEDERSENPenningtons Manches Cooper
ARTICLE 79
New Guiding Opinion from the Supreme People’s Court of the PRC: judicial precedents to play a more important role in the PRC’s future legal practices
(First published in Hong Kong Lawyer)
Lianjun Li, Cheryl YuReed Smith Richards Butler
ARTICLE 78
COVID-19: Recent Legal Responses and the Application of Force Majeure and Change of Circumstances in the PRC (First published in Hong Kong Lawyer)
Lianjun Li, Peter Glover, Cheryl YuReed Smith Richards Butler
ARTICLE 77
Hong Kong’s New Regime for Ship Leasing Tax Concessions
Lianjun Li, Peter Lee, Tat Pan, Arthur LamReed Smith Richards Butler
ARTICLE 76
Opinion on Liability of Steamer Agents to Pay Demurrage
Hari NarayanUnited Maritime Law Chambers
ARTICLE 75
"Want to Arbitrate at the SCMA? Get the Clause right..."
STEFFEN PEDERSENPenningtons Manches Cooper
ARTICLE 74
Case Update: CDI V CDJ [2020] SGHC 118
Magdalene Chew, Edwin Cai and Chengxi TanAsialegal LLC
ARTICLE 73
Serving the Maritime Ecosystem
(An extract from the 2021 edition of GAR’s The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review,
first published in July 2020. The whole publication is available at https://globalarbitrationreview.com/
edition/1001508/the-asia-pacific-arbitration-review-)
Punit OzaExecutive Director, SCMA
ARTICLE 72
COVID-19: Collision Risk at Chittagong Port, Bangladesh
Mohammed Forrukh Rahman
ARTICLE 71
EU Law and Mediation
Mark Clough QCLux-Mediation
ARTICLE 70
Co-Mediation in Commercial Disputes
Lux-Mediation
ARTICLE 69
Arbitration and Digital Transformation: A Perfect Match
Svenja WachtelLegalRevolution
ARTICLE 68
Sanctions Compliance in the Shipping Industry
Mike SalthouseThe North of England P&I Association Limited
ARTICLE 67
The Correct Test for Determining What Law Governs an Arbitration Agreement
FRANCIS HORNYOLD-STRICKLAND
ARTICLE 66
The Go-Between: Resolving Disputes in Uncertain Times – A Mediator’s Perspective
David Owen QC & Angharad ParryTwenty Essex
ARTICLE 65
Prevention Principle & Notification Requirements to Move Delivery and Cancellation Dates – SAJ Form
Andrew DinsmoreTwenty Essex
ARTICLE 64
International Group P&I Club Letters of Indemnity Return to the Courts
Michael Ashcroft QC & Oliver CaplinTwenty Essex
ARTICLE 63
Implications of COVID-19 on Shipping Contracts: Time and Voyage Charterparties
Tommy Thomas Advocates & Solicitors
ARTICLE 62
Dispute Resolution and Mediation during the COVID-19 Disruption
Jonathan LuxLux-Mediation
ARTICLE 61
E-Dispute Resolution, World War C and the Ongoing Resolution of Maritime Disputes
Jonathan LuxLux-Mediation
ARTICLE 60
Restraining Winding-Up Proceedings in Favour of Arbitration:
What is the Standard for Granting an Injunction?
Kendall TanRajah & Tann Asia
ARTICLE 59
Soundbites - Various Decisions on Arbitration and Maritime Issues
K Murali PanyJoseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 58
The Future is Now: International Mediation
Jonathan Lux
ARTICLE 57
How Do Sanctions Impact on Trade in the Black Sea Region
Arthur Nitsevych, Alex RemesloInterlegal Law Firm
ARTICLE 56
The Role of the Marine Surveyor- a P&I club’s perspective
Jason WeeCharles Taylor Mutual Management (Asia) Pte. Ltd
ARTICLE 55
The Indian Admiralty Act, 2017 - An Overview
Hari NarayanUnited Maritime Law Chambers, India
ARTICLE 54
The "Long Bright": Can An Arresting Party Freely Release An Arrested Vessel?
Chong Ik WeiClyde & Co Clasis Singapore
ARTICLE 53
International Arbitration in Indonesia Common Challenges
Paul Aston, Dwi Daruherdani, Suzanne Meiklejohn
ARTICLE 52
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 23 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 51
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 23 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 50
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 22 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 49
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 21 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 48
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 20 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 47
Force Majeure revisited
Mr Muthu Jagannath
ARTICLE 46
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 19 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 45
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 19 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 44
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 18 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 43
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 18 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 42
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 17 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 41
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 17 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 40
Shipping News Bulletin
QuadrantChambers
ARTICLE 39
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 16 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 38
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 16 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 37
Enforcement of commercial (maritime) foreign arbitral awards in Ukraine
Arthur NitsevychInterlegal Law
ARTICLE 36
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 15 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 35
JTJB April Legal Update 2016
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 34
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law News Update - Vol 14 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 33
JTJB January Legal Update 2016
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 32
Korea University
Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law
News Update
- Vol 13 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 31
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre
Maritime Law News Update - Vol 13 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 30
JTJB December Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 29
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre
Maritime Law News Update - Vol 12 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 28
JTJB November Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 27
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre
Maritime Law News Update - Vol 12 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 26
Court of Appeal Judgement in the OW Bunkers case
Stephen Hofmeyr QC7KBW Chambers
ARTICLE 25
Briefing on the Court of Appeal Decision in OW Bunkers
20 Essex Street
ARTICLE 24
JTJB October Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 23
JTJB September Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 22
JTJB August Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 21
JTJB July Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 20
JTJB June Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 19
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre
Maritime Law News Update - Vol 11 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 18
Korea University Maritime Law Research Centre
Maritime Law News Update - Vol 11 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 17
JTJB May Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 16
JTJB April Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 15
Korean University
Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law
News Update
– Vol. 10 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 14
Korean University
Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law
News Update
– Vol. 10 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 13
2014 Review of Australian Shipping Cases
Mr. MatthewHarvey
ARTICLE 12
JTJB March Legal Update 2015
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
ARTICLE 11
London Leading – A Mediator’s View on Mediation in arbitration
Mr JonathanLux
ARTICLE 10
Korean University
Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law
News Update
– Vol. 9 (English)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 9
Korean University
Maritime Law Research Centre Maritime Law
News Update
– Vol. 9 (Chinese)
Prof.Kim In-Hyeon
ARTICLE 8
Arrest of Ships in the Black Sea Region
Mr Arthur Nitsevych
ARTICLE 7
A long arm for shipping's 'invisible hand'
Mr. Basil M.Karatzas
ARTICLE 6
FAIRPLAY Manhattan's tale of Two Cities
Mr. Basil M.Karatzas
ARTICLE 5
Australia Shipping Update - Wrecked ship "Tycoon" at Christmas Island
Mr Shane Bosma
ARTICLE 4
NYT The Global Downturn Weighs on Shipowners and Banks
Mr. Basil Basil M.Karatzas
ARTICLE 3
Making a Market
Mr. Basil M.Karatzas
ARTICLE 2
ME What's a Ship Worth_BLOC
Mr.Basil M.Karatzas
ARTICLE 1
What's in the value of a vessel?
Mr. Basil M.Karatzas
AWARDS
Authenticate Original Awards & Certify Original Arbitration Agreements Pursuant to section 19C(1) of the Singapore International Arbitration Act (IAA) and section 59A(1) of the Singapore Arbitration Act 2001 (AA), the Minister for Law has appointed the Registrar and Chairman of the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration to:
(a) authenticate the original award* and certify copies thereof; and
(b) certify copies of the original arbitration agreement^.
*Including, but not limited to, awards arising out of arbitrations conducted according to any arbitration rules of the SCMA.
^Including, but not limited to, arbitration agreements providing for the use of any arbitration rules of the SCMA.
Procedures for Authenticating Awards & Certifying Arbitration Agreements A) Procedure for authenticating original awards
1. In accordance with SCMA Rule 8.7, the Tribunal shall inform the SCMA of its appointment with 7 days of its appointment. When doing so the Tribunal is asked to provide the following information: names of the arbitrator(s) forming the Tribunal, the names of the lawyers representing the parties, brief nature of the dispute and approximate amount in dispute and the nationality of the parties, but not the names of the parties.
2. Within 7 clear working days of the Tribunal informing the SCMA of its appointment, the SCMA shall provide each member of the Tribunal with the SCMA case reference number.
3. In accordance with SCMA Rule 34, the Tribunal shall send a copy of the Award to SCMA within 14 days from collection by one of the parties. The Award shall state its date and be signed by a majority of the members of the Tribunal.
4. The Tribunal should mention the SCMA case reference number, but if not the SCMA should request this within 14 clear working days of the receipt of the copy of the Award.
5. As a precaution, the SCMA will within 14 clear working days of receipt of the copy of the Award, contact in writing or in person one of the members of the Tribunal for reconfirmation that this is an accurate and complete copy of the Award and that the Award has been collected.
6. A party to the arbitration or its appointed representative may apply in writing to the SCMA to authenticate the original Award. The applicant must provide an original of the signed Award and the SCMA case reference number.
7. Within 7 clear working days of receiving a complete application, the SCMA shall check that the original of the Award submitted is the same as the copy retained by the SCMA as per paragraph 3 above.
8. If the original Award is the same as per paragraph 7 above, the Registrar or Chairman of the SCMA shall authenticate the original Award within 7 clear working days of the SCMA receiving the complete application.
9. The SCMA shall retain a copy of the original Award that has been authenticated.
B) Procedure for certifying copies of the original Award
1. A party to the arbitration or its appointed representative may apply in writing to the SCMA for a certified copy of the original authenticated Award. The applicant must provide the SCMA case reference number.
2. If the SCMA has authenticated the original Award, within 7 clear working days of receiving a complete application, the SCMA shall provide a certified copy of the authenticated original Award.
3. If the SCMA has not authenticated the original Award, within 7 clear working days of receiving a complete application, the SCMA will decline to provide a certified copy until the original Award has been provided to the SCMA for authentication. The procedure for authentication is that in Part A above.
C) Procedure for authenticating the original arbitration agreement
1. A party to the arbitration or its appointed representative may apply in writing to the SCMA to authenticate the original arbitration agreement. When doing so the applicant must provide the original arbitration agreement together with either (i) written confirmation from a majority of the Tribunal that the arbitration agreement is the agreement under which the dispute was submitted to arbitration, or (ii) otherwise evidence this to the satisfaction of SCMA by reference to the agreement and to the Award.
2. Within 7 clear working days of receiving a complete application, the SCMA shall make a determination whether the original arbitration agreement is the agreement under which the dispute was submitted to arbitration.
3. If the SCMA makes a determination that the original arbitration agreement is the agreement under which the dispute was submitted to arbitration, the Registrar or Chairman of the SCMA shall authenticate the original arbitration agreement within 7 clear working days of the SCMA receiving the complete application.
4. The SCMA shall retain a copy of the authenticated original arbitration agreement,
5. If the SCMA makes a determination the that the original arbitration agreement is not the agreement under which the dispute was submitted to arbitration, the Registrar or Chairman of the SCMA shall so notify the applicant within 7 clear working days of the SCMA receiving the complete application. The SCMA is under no obligation to do so, but can give reasons to the applicant for its determination.
D) Procedure for certifying copies of the original arbitration agreement
1. A party to the arbitration or its appointed representative that applies to the SCMA to authenticate the original arbitration agreement, may also apply to the SCMA to certify copies of that agreement. The SCMA will certify copies of the agreement at the same time that it authenticates the agreement.
2. If the original arbitration agreement is not available, a party to the arbitration or its appointed representative may apply in writing to the SCMA to certify copies of the original arbitration agreement. When doing so the applicant must provide copies of the original arbitration agreement together with either (i) written confirmation from a majority of the Tribunal that the arbitration agreement is the agreement under which the dispute was submitted to arbitration, or (ii) otherwise evidence this to the satisfaction of SCMA by reference to the agreement and to the Award.
3. Within 7 clear working days of receiving a complete application, the SCMA shall make a determination whether the original arbitration agreement is the agreement under which the dispute was submitted to arbitration.
4. If the SCMA makes a determination that the original arbitration agreement is the agreement under which the dispute was submitted to arbitration, the Registrar or Chairman of the SCMA shall certify the copy of the arbitration agreement within 7 clear working days of the SCMA receiving the complete application.
5. The SCMA shall retain a copy of the copy of the original arbitration agreement submitted.
6. If the SCMA makes a determination that the original arbitration agreement is not the agreement under which the dispute was submitted to arbitration, the Registrar or Chairman of the SCMA shall so notify the applicant within 7 clear working days of the SCMA receiving the complete application. The SCMA is under no obligation to do so, but can give reasons to the applicant for its determination.
|
|